Why the Germans lost

Why Germany Lost and Why It Took the Allies So Long to Win As the World War II started, in 1939, the majority of the European nations were framing unions to prepare for the war. The vast majority of the Eastern Europe nations ganged up with Germany to shape a more grounded collusion. Germany was the top choices in this war and declared to be the most grounded contender in the entire of Europe.Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on Why the Germans lost explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More German had vanquished about portion of Europe along these lines making it simple for them to seek after different nations in war. With Adolf Hitler in order, he drove his military to severely battle and overcome what he named as adversaries of Germany (Overy, 1997). Germany’s solid point was that they utilized overwhelming mounted guns and had a surprisingly steady aviation based armed forces. With an all out number of 6000 tanks and 4000 airplanes, the Germa ns predicted early triumph in this war. They had an amazing ground breaking strategy on the best way to win the war. They connected with gigantic tank fights and destabilized a large portion of the eastern front powers. Nazi powers vanquished Denmark, Sweden and Poland which was an indispensable procedure to Hitler. This success guaranteed him that he would win the war. After a progression of wars, Germany figured out how to crush Holland, France and Belgium subsequently the Nazi’s kept on driving further and assault Britain (Overy, 1997). In the pacific waters, the Japans were battling for the benefit of the Germans. They had indistinguishable belief systems from the Germans henceforth prompted Hitler requesting the monstrous slaughter of the Jewish. Germans were in the fore front underway of ordnances, henceforth gave them a high ground to control the conveyance of armed force assets. Germany and Japan were decidedly ready for the war henceforth they had started enrollment procedure of enlisting youthful warriors and drawing in them to enthusiastic preparing (Overy, 1997). The Germany’s battling front confronted a few shortcomings. Hitler was not sure on what choice to take. While drawing in the soviet powers, he took such a long time to conclude whether to assault or not. He needed to utilize his new armada of tanks known as jaguar tanks. He was incredibly sure that the jaguar tanks will give him triumph. The soviet powers got them unconscious, and crushed them in this fight. Every one of his expectations of utilizing the jaguar tanks went down the channel since a large portion of this tanks separated at the fight while a decent number of the tanks fell into his opponents’ hands. Another shortcoming is that the Germans thought little of the capacity of their enemies.Advertising Looking for paper on history? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In the fight against Britain, the Germa n powers had arranged an activity Sealion. They were to destabilize the Royal Air Force through and through. Notwithstanding, the Royal Air Force with the assistance of the Soviet Union toppled Germany’s plan and crushed them. This incensed Hitler, and he chose to attack Russia (MacDonald, 2009). Another extraordinary difficulty came after Adolf Hitler’s self destruction crucial. The Nazi needed to battle for their lives and without anybody to lead them along these lines they abandoned the war. The Nazi’s experienced a great deal of difficulties like; absence of fuel for their tanks and air creates, nourishment for their military and clinical treatment. The Americans chose to prevent the Nazi’s from overcoming the world. They assaulted the japans with nuclear bombs and injured the Germans front in the Asian wing. Likewise with the partners, they had more advanced tanks than the Germans and more innovation on war toll. They designed the nuclear bombs which assumed an essential job to pulverize the German powers. Also, the partners were significantly preferred with these refined logical innovations. They likewise combined modern force for example Britain and France, Soviet Union and America. This empowered them to be a lot of unrivaled as far as assembling secret weapons of war. Their modern capacity dominated that of the Germans. The partners additionally were the main providers of oil to Japan consequently it was anything but difficult to disable Japan by simply denying them this valuable ware. The Royal Air Force of Britain was better than the Germans’ flying corps. This prompted the crushed of Germans’ aviation based armed forces. With this quiet destruction, British aviation based armed forces assumed responsibility for almost 50% of Europe air space. The partners had a high ground on this since they constrained Germany to sign the settlement of Versailles. This arrangement constrained the Germans not to utilize tan ks, air creates and other overwhelming gunnery. The partners were very sorted out and all around arranged. This also gave them an advantage to counter both the Japanese armed force adrift and the Germans. The partners had ground-breaking aviation based armed forces and controlled the maritime exercises. This was the key angle to win the war. The red armed force of the partners figured out how to battle viably as a unit until the war finished. They increased a lot of help from the regular citizen assets subsequently they developed certainty to win this war (Overy, 1997). The partners confronted constrained consumption on armed force hardware. This gave an advantage to the Germans since they contributed every one of their assets to obtain the best military hardware. Hitler had essentially meddled with the weaponry of the partners consequently they confronted a great deal of inconveniences in working these weapons.Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on Why the Germans lost explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More The allies’ warriors were generally incompetent giving them a ton of challenges in the war. Battling an exceptionally merciless pioneer, for example, Hitler end up being an exceedingly troublesome undertaking since the majority of the allies’ armed force officers were ruthlessly killed. Any incitement towards him prompted numerous honest casualties biting the dust. German was decidedly ready for this war, and thus, numerous allies’ officers were gotten unconscious when the war started. Numerous nations revitalized behind Germany in World War II. It was extremely simple for Germany to get their help since every one of these nations were Germany’s success in the prior fights (Overy, 1997). References Overy, R. (1997). Why the Allies Won. New York: W.W. Norton Publishers. MacDonald, F. (2009). World War 2. New York: Gareth Stevens Publishing. This article on Why the Germans lost was composed and put together by client Sonia Whitney to help you with your own investigations. You are allowed to utilize it for research and reference purposes so as to compose your own paper; in any case, you should refer to it in like manner. You can give your paper here.

Cause Effect of European Exploration

All of Europe had the energy and faltering of finding new places. There were numerous explanations behind Europe to develop and extend, a portion of the foundations for Europe’s extension were; a quest for new exchange courses, religion, new innovation, the longing for new items and gold. Europe needed to locate another exchange course to Asia since they needed the silk, flavors, gems, and wealth from China and India that were entirely important. One of the issues that were confronted was that when they showed up in Western Europe, the items had been burdened so often en route that they were amazingly costly. They needed to discover a course around with the goal that they could get the products first. They needed to locate a northwest entry. Christian rulers in Europe needed to spread their religion of Christianity all through the abroad investigation, they believed they had an obligation to continue battling for Muslims yet in addition to change over non-Christians all through the world. Bartolomeu Dias (Portuguese pilgrim) said that his intention was â€Å"to serve God and His Majesty, to offer light to the individuals who were in murkiness and to develop rich as all men want to do. † European investigates would be wise to route abilities and gear to assist them with finding their direction. They had a compass and moveable rudder which permitted the pilgrims to cruise considerably farther than previously. They likewise utilized an astrolabe which utilized the stars to decide how far north or south they were from the equator. European wayfarers were set for locate these new grounds and new advancements, those causes animated impacts for the fallout of the investigation. One of the impacts on European investigation was the Columbian Exchange. This trade comprised of exchanging between the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia. The Americas sent over squash, pumpkins, turkey, peanuts, potatoes, tomatoes, corn, yams, peppers, tobacco, pineapple, cacao, beans and vanilla. Europe, Africa and Asia sent over citrus natural products, bananas, grapes, sugar stick, bumble bees, onions, olives, turnips, peaches, pears, and espresso beans. They additionally sent over things other then food, for example, grains, wheat, rice, grain and oats. They sent numerous sorts of live stock and an enormous thing they sent over was illness. The Triangle Trade was another exchanging framework between New England the West Indies and West Africa. New England sent West Africa rum, weapons/black powder, material and apparatuses. West Africa sent sugar and molasses to New England and New England sent back domesticated animals, wood, flour and fish. As the exchanging expanded during the sixteenth and all through the eighteenth century, a large number of individuals were removed from their home and expelled to manors in the New World. Europeans took a chance with their lives to investigate new terrains, the development abroad accompany seeks after land, wealth and social headway. Cause Effect of European Exploration All of Europe had the fervor and delay of finding new places. There were numerous purposes behind Europe to develop and grow, a portion of the foundations for Europe’s extension were; a quest for new exchange courses, religion, new innovation, the craving for new items and gold. Europe needed to locate another exchange course to Asia since they needed the silk, flavors, gems, and wealth from China and India that were entirely important. One of the issues that were confronted was that when they showed up in Western Europe, the items had been burdened so often en route that they were incredibly costly. They needed to discover a course around with the goal that they could get the merchandise first. They needed to locate a northwest section. Christian rulers in Europe needed to spread their religion of Christianity all through the abroad investigation, they believed they had an obligation to continue battling for Muslims yet additionally to change over non-Christians all through the world. Bartolomeu Dias (Portuguese pioneer) said that his rationale was â€Å"to serve God and His Majesty, to offer light to the individuals who were in haziness and to develop rich as all men want to do. † European investigates would be advised to route abilities and hardware to assist them with finding their direction. They had a compass and moveable rudder which permitted the pioneers to cruise much farther than previously. They likewise utilized an astrolabe which utilized the stars to decide how far north or south they were from the equator. European voyagers were set for locate these new grounds and new innovations, those causes invigorated impacts for the result of the investigation. One of the impacts on European investigation was the Columbian Exchange. This trade comprised of exchanging between the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia. The Americas sent over squash, pumpkins, turkey, peanuts, potatoes, tomatoes, corn, yams, peppers, tobacco, pineapple, cacao, beans and vanilla. Europe, Africa and Asia sent over citrus natural products, bananas, grapes, sugar stick, bumble bees, onions, olives, turnips, peaches, pears, and espresso beans. They additionally sent over things other then food, for example, grains, wheat, rice, grain and oats. They sent numerous kinds of live stock and an immense thing they sent over was illness. The Triangle Trade was another exchanging framework between New England the West Indies and West Africa. New England sent West Africa rum, firearms/black powder, fabric and instruments. West Africa sent sugar and molasses to New England and New England sent back domesticated animals, timber, flour and fish. As the exchanging expanded during the sixteenth and all through the eighteenth century, a huge number of individuals were removed from their home and ousted to manors in the New World. Europeans took a chance with their lives to investigate new grounds, the development abroad accompany seeks after land, wealth and social progression.

SIPA International Fellows Program Symposium This Friday COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

SIPA International Fellows Program Symposium This Friday COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog Strobe Talbott, President of the Brookings Institution. Since SIPA and Columbia University are global institutions of learning, I thought many of you would be interested in attending this weeks symposium about the International Fellows Program (IFP), on Friday, April 17, 2015 at the International Affairs Building, Room 1501. The IFP Symposium will feature a keynote address by Strobe Talbott, President of the Brookings Institution and former Deputy Secretary of State, on Russia, Europe, and the U.S., with a focus on the Ukraine crisis and beyond.  Following the keynote, he will be joined for a panel discussion by Maxim Boycko, visiting scholar at the National Bureau of Economic Research; Kim Marten, associate professor of political science at Barnard College; Constanze Stelzenmueller, senior fellow at Brookings; and Stephen Sestanovich, Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Professor for the Practice of International Diplomacy and director of the International Fellows Program. You may RSVP for the event here. If youre asking yourself,  what is IFP?,  well, its pretty simple (and exciting).  The International Fellows Program is a two-semester multidisciplinary seminar open to 30 students of all graduate degree programs at Columbia University. All fellows receive a stipend and study a curriculum with two goals â€" to examine the origins of the current international order, in which the United States has for decades played the leading role, and to look ahead to the new world that will eventually take its place, dominated by a larger number of actors, new problems, and approaches to problem solving that have yet to be defined. Participation in the International Fellows Program provides unique programming and networking opportunities with prominent figures of the international community. (Learn more about IFP in this 4-minute video.) FYI, if you didnt get into the IFP this year, its OK. You may still reapply for the program in your second year! For questions about the program, please contact Director Stephen Sestanovich at  ss2059@columbia.edu.

Freuds Theory of Psychoanalysis in Shutter Island - Literature Essay Samples

Freud’s introduction to the concept of psychoanalysis was one that provided an explanation as well as a potential solution to an issue that was otherwise untreated: hysteria. Although Freud’s theory was met with heavy skepticism, it is a theory that had enough merit to still be used in today’s psychological field. Freud acknowledged his theory’s incompleteness but claimed that it was better than the alternative, for if someone provided a complete and thorough theory, it would be a product of pure speculation (Freud 5). What makes Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis so valuable is that it is effective. Not only as a treatment, but as an explanatory text regarding trauma and hysteria. A prime example of Freud’s concepts of psychoanalysis and hysteria may be found in the novel Shutter Island. Edward â€Å"Teddy† Daniels, the protagonist of Shutter Island suffers from the symptoms of repression and trauma, and his repressed object is attempti ng to surface from his unconscious through the trials in which Daniels undergoes throughout the novel. As aforementioned, Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis was largely incomplete and was thus met with objection. His test subjects were very similar in their upbringing and nature, and it was also an embarrassingly small test group compared to his colleagues’ work. Not only that, part of his treatment for hysteria and trauma involved the use of a sort of hypnosis, a practice hardly understood even by today’s psychologists. Freud acknowledged this; and though it was not a thorough theory, it still revealed much about trauma and hysteria that most knew little about. Freud writes when talking about doctors: â€Å"He cannot understand hysteria. He is in the same position before it as the layman.† (2). And what’s more: Freud’s methods, though somewhat in their infant stage, often times worked. In fact, the fundamental idea of his theory is practiced by contemporaries today. At its very least, the theory provided a step towards treatment, as, â€Å"Hys tericals, accordingly, tend to lose his [doctors’] sympathy†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Freud 2) and often went untreated. Psychoanalysis operates based on the idea that symptoms of hysteria are a product of a process known as repression. John Wilson writes, â€Å"According to Freudian thinking the ego is highly selective in what it regards as legitimate parts of itself and censors anything it does not like as a result of shame, guilt or morality. These dissociated parts of ourselves will be forced away and kept in the id.† This is the fundamental idea of repression: memories, thoughts, or experiences that do not concur with our self-image are sent into the unconscious (also known as the id). Freud says, however, that the repressed object is always attempting to resurface from the unconscious; he writes, â€Å"If a stream flows in two channels, an overflow of one will take place as soon as the current in the other meets with an obstacle.† (5). This â€Å"overflow† is where one may begin to see hysterical symptoms as a result of repression. Although there are several case studies, Freud goes into most depth in his lectures regarding a particular case involving devastating symptoms. He describes a woman with â€Å"severe paralysisdisturbance of eye-movements, and much impairment of vision; difficulty in maintaining the position of the head, an intense nausea when she attempted to take nourishment, and at one time for several weeks a loss of the power to drink, in spite of tormenting thirst. Her power of speech was also diminishedshe could neither speak nor understand her mother tongueshe was subject to states of ‘absence,’ of confusion, delirium, alteration of her whole personality.† (1). It is important to note that until Freud and his partners, these severe symptoms of hysteria often went untreated, for it was a misunderstood and mysterious disorder. Although Freud’s theory was lacking in many aspects, it was able to at least provide treatment for several patients who suffered these severe sy mptoms as well as provide some significant insight into what was otherwise an essentially untouched subject. He continues to write, â€Å"The doctorput her in a sort of hypnosis and repeated them to her over and over [the objects that were repressed], in order to bring up any associationsThe patient yielded to his suggestion and reproduced for him those psychic creationsThese were fanciesday dreamswhich commonly took as their starting point the situation of a girl beside the sick-bed of her father. Whenever she had related a number of such fancies, she was, as it were, freed and restored to her normal mental life.† (2). Also, â€Å"When this had been going on about six weeks [her not drinking], she was talking one day in hypnosis about her English governess, whom she disliked, and finally told, with every sign of disgust, how she had come into the room of the governess, and how that lady’s little dog, that she abhorred, had drunk out of a glassafter she had given ener getic expression to her restrained anger, she asked for a drink, drank a large quantity of water without troubleThe symptom thereupon vanished permanently.† (3). This was the origin of what is known as the â€Å"talking cure†. The â€Å"talking cure† is essentially the extracting of the repressed object which would in turn lead to the resolution of the patient’s symptoms. The â€Å"talking cure† based its methods off the fact that, â€Å"The nature of the symptoms became clear through their relation to the scene which caused them.† (Freud 3) and that â€Å"hysterical patients suffer from reminiscences.† (Freud 4). This is crucial when psychoanalyzing Edward â€Å"Teddy† Daniels from Shutter Island, as the novel in its entirety is a product of Daniels’s suffering from repression. Edward Daniels is subject to an immense amount of trauma. He was a World War II veteran and was exposed to the most gruesome aspects of the already horrific war. One example of his war traumas is as follows: â€Å"Cawleyplaced a record on the phonograph and the scratch of the needle was followed by stray pops and hissesReminding him ofa record collection he’d seen in the office of a subcommandant at Dachau, the man listening to it when he’d shot himself in the mouth. He was still alive when Teddyentered the room. Gurgling. (Lehane 76). Daniels, though a character with little sympathy for injustice, still cannot help feeling perturbed by such a gruesome event. Although this was not his primary trauma, it only added to the unfathomable amount of psychological distress Daniels was burdened with. Teddy also recounts a more severe trauma, saying is as follows: â€Å"They looked at us and they wanted us to do what we did. And we sure as hell wanted to do it. So we executed every one of those fucking Krauts. Disarmed them, leaned them against walls, executed themBy the end of that day, we’d removed five hundred souls from the face of the Earth. Murdered ‘em all. No self-defense, no warfare came into it. It was homicideThey deserved so much worsebut how do you live with that? How do you tell the wife and the parents and the kids that you’ve done this thing? You’ve executed unarmed people? You’ve killed boys?what you did was also wrong. And you’ll never wash it off.† (Lehane 144-145). This memory is almost unparalleled in its traumatic scope. Teddy, already dealing with the psychological distress that comes with war, was posed with a remarkably difficult ethical situation. His own desires, along with other public pressures, encouraged the execution of the Nazi soldiers; however, the mass-murder of five hundred people was something that conflicted with his self-image, despite who these people were, and thus added even more immense psychological stress. To completely understand how powerful the trauma that actually inspired Teddy’s delusion was, it is necessary to understand that the aforementioned traumas were not repressed but merely added stress. What was repressed was something arguably much darker than even mass-murder. The following is the description of a woman named Rachel Solando’s crime; this name however is an alias in which Teddy assigned to take the place of his wife, Dolores Chanal. Rachel Solando is a completely fictitious character in which the following crime’s blame was placed as a product of delusion and Teddy’s inability to mentally handle that Dolores Chanel, his wife, was in fact the one to commit the crime: â€Å"Rachel Solandodrowned her three children in the lake behind her house. Took them out there one by one and held their heads under until they died. Then she brought them back into the house and arranged them around the kitchen table and ate a meal there† (Lehane 41). Upon discovering this, Teddy (which he himself should be noted is also a product of delusion; Edward â€Å"Teddy† Daniels is, in fact, Andrew Laeddis)[1] murders his wife. This is the trauma that completely split Teddy’s consciousness. Wilson writes, â€Å"If one does not like an idea or an impression then one simply shuts it out and refuses to believe it can exist. At the same time one nurtures and encourages one’s preferred belief system and amplifies its existence by repetition and the impetus of acquired duration.†. This is precisely what Teddy (or rather Andrew) suffers from. To fully comprehend what an impact the aforementioned event had on Teddy, one must realize that even in his complex delusion in which is Shutter Island, he still remembers the subcommandant as well as the mass-murder. This is indicated to be fact, as the psychiatrists on Shutter Island do verify that Teddy was a U.S. Marshal and war veteran. Referring back to Freud’s case studies, we see a woman was left unable to consume water due to her seeing a dog she despised drink from a glass. Compare that to Teddy’s traumas, and it is clear that he has incredible psychological will. For him to completely bury the trauma involving Rachel Solando/Dolores Chanal and frame a web of delusion that somehow excluded the situation indicates what profound psychological impact the event had on Teddy. And this delusion in which was a product of such a traumatic event is what frames the plot for Lehane’s Shutter Island: Teddy, a U.S. Marshal looking for escaped murderess Rachel Solando. Teddy of course has no recollection of his true identity or that he murdered his wife and is also ignorant to the fact that Rachel Solando, who drowned her three kids, is in fact a proxy of sorts for his wife, Dolores Chanal. Teddy’s delusion, though remarkably intricate, is not without slight flaws though. Teddy, upon meeting his randomly assigned partner (who is in fact his psychiatrist) observes his partner’s, â€Å"olive skin and slim, delicate hands that seemed incongruous with the rest of him, as if he’d borrowed them until his real ones came back from the shop.† (Lehane 14). His partner’s awkward hands was a discrepancy between what his delusion proposed and reality. This is seen again when Teddy confronts Rachel Solando (who in reality was a nurse at the institution) and ponders how, â€Å"There was something uncomfortably familiar about her†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Lehane 43-44). Along with that, there is yet another conflict seen when Teddy is attempting to solve a code (in which he unknowingly created): â€Å"Teddy thought it was speaking to him, becoming clearerhe could feel something about them scratching at his brainIt was right in front of him. It was so simpleAnd then any possible bridges of logic collapsed, and Teddy felt his mind go white†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Lehane 52). The reason being for the mental collapse was because he could not consciously solve what his unconscious mind had created without ruining his delusion. His mind responds by essentially shutting down in order to protect his created reality. Along with the aforementioned, there is another conflict that can be found which takes form in a dream Teddy has. The dream goes as follows: â€Å"He’s here.† â€Å"Who?† â€Å"Laeddis.† The name crawls through his flesh and climbs over his bones. â€Å"No.† â€Å"Yes.† She [Dolores Chanal] bends her head back, looks up at him. â€Å"You’ve known.† â€Å"I haven’t.† â€Å"Yes, you have.† (Lehane 89). All of these instances are examples of the repressed thought trying to resurface into consciousness. However, Freud observed that if the repressed object is contradictory enough to one’s morals and ethics, it will continue to remain buried in the unconscious for an untold amount of time. Such is the case in all of the aforementioned instances. Dreams play a significant role in the psychoanalysis of Teddy, as theâ€Å"Interpretation of dreams is in factthe interpretation of the unconscious†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Freud 11). Teddy’s dreams can corroborate with Freud’s claim, as they usually provide some sort of relation to Teddy’s trauma with his wife. In one dream, he sees his wife, and â€Å"the back of her is charred, smoldering a bitand small ribbons of smoke unwind from her hair.† (Lehane 87). Then, â€Å"she’s no longer burned, she’s soaking wet.† (Lehane 87). The reason he sees his wife charred and burned is because she had burned their old apartment down. Teddy repressed that event too, for it was psychologically too difficult for him to process and, after the burning of their apartment, decided it would be better for their family to move to a cabin, which is presented in the next segment of his dream: â€Å"the view of another place they stayed once, a cabin. There’s a small pond out there with small logs floating in it†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Lehane 88). Then, â€Å"Her belly springs a leak and the liquid flows through his hands,† (Lehane 88) and, â€Å"His tears spill down her body and mix with her pouring belly.† (Lehane 89). The constant recurring theme of water is perhaps the most useful in its relation to his past trauma; recognizing the symbolism in water is crucial because it represents the drowning of his children. To further confirm this, his children are what he refers to as the â€Å"small logs† floating in the water. The significance allotted to water extends past mere dreams; Teddy also suffers throughout the novel from severe sea-sickness. Along with that, Teddy was constantly being reminded of his dead wife by seemingly random things, and one of the triggers with the most significant effect in this was water: when referring to things that reminded him of his wife, Teddy observes â€Å"nothing was less logical in term s of connective tissue, or more pungent in terms of effect, than water†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Lehane 20). This, of course, was not random but instead was directly related to Teddy’s past trauma in which his kids were drowned by his wife, which is why water had such a devastating effect on him. Another example of a dream that allows the reader to peek into Teddy’s unconscious is one in which Teddy and Andrew Laeddis both switch roles in having sex with Rachel Solando and Dolores Chanal with seeming randomness. This ease of interchangeability is due to the fact that Teddy and Andrew are one in the same, as are Rachel and Dolores; the way they are separate is by means of Teddy’s delusion. Sleep is a time devoid of consciousness, thus there is less resistance against the repressed object to surface. Teddy, already under extreme psychological stress, also suffers physiological symptoms. When referring to war veterans, Jeneen Interlandi writes, â€Å"In addition to their nightmares and hallucinations, many of them had a host of physical ailments including headaches, fatigue, digestive troubles and shut down.†. In her paper â€Å"How do you Heal a Traumatized Mind?†, Interlandi relays her experiences with psychologist Bessel van der Kolk. One of these experiences was a role-play similar to the one Teddy underwent. The role-play subject was a man named Eugene; â€Å"his job involved disposing of exploded bombs. It was a year of dead bodies, he said. He saw, touched, smell and stepped in more bodies than he could possibly count. Some of them were children.† (Interlandi). This is not entirely unlike some of Teddy’s war traumas. Also, â€Å"Eugene killed an innocent man and then watched as the man’s mother discovered the body a short while later.â₠¬  (Interlandi). While Eugene and Teddy suffer separate traumas, they both are war-related and they both yielded physiological issues. These issues surfaced due to the fact that, â€Å"repressed memories were a common feature of traumatic stress. Traumatic experiences were not being processed into memoriesbut were somehow getting ‘stuck in the machine’ and then expressed through the body.† (Interlandi). Perhaps Teddy’s most prevalent physiological symptom is headaches. These headaches often materialize when Teddy faces a potential conflict between his delusion and reality. Some examples of the pain he suffers from headaches are: â€Å"A dull ache settled into the left side of his head, just behind the eye, as if the flat side of an old spoon were pressed there.† (Lehane 21), â€Å"Teddy was feeling the place in the back of his skull by that point.† (Lehane 113), â€Å"a canyon filled with lava cut through the skull just below the part in his hairthe pain erupted like a dozen dagger points pushed slowly into his cranium†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Lehane 175), etc. It may be noted that the latter of all of these, which is perhaps one of the most intense physiological pains he endures, was after confronting Rachel Solando. Even Freud talked about psychological disturbances leading to physiological symptoms: â€Å"they undergo a change into unusual bodily innervations and inhibitions, which present themselves as the physical symptoms of the case.† (5). Kamuf writes of another symptom: â€Å"a foreign body is always a symptom, it always does symptom [fait symptome] on the body of the ego, it is a body foreign to the body of the ego.† Teddy, in several instances throughout the novel, expresses the discomfort he feels in his own body. Interlandi too confirms this symptom in saying, â€Å"Trauma victimsare alienated from their bodies by a cascade of events that begins deep in the brain.†. These physiological occurrences only add to Teddy’s incomprehensible amount of stress. Sabouri and Sadeghzadegan write, â€Å"what indeed gives rise to the psychotic state of Andrew is the excessive repetition and recurrence of his delusions, hallucinations and dreams whose sole message is the reminiscence ofpast traumas he finds himself unable to recollect.†. Teddy (in reality, Andrew Laeddis) is a victim of repression; his wife drowned their three children and he in turn murders her. This is a profoundly dark event, and Teddy responds to it by entirely shutting it out from his consciousness and then formulating an intricate and detailed web of delusions in which allow him to continue living without these memories. His delusion proposes that his name is Edward â€Å"Teddy† Daniels, a U.S. Marshal searching for escaped murderess Rachel Solando on Shutter Island (the place in which he is institutionalized for having murdered his wife and having been a victim to extreme psychological pressures). The psychiatrists at Shutter Island allow Teddy to play out hi s delusion in the hopes it might act as a sort of parallel to Freud’s â€Å"talking cure†. In fact, Freedman writes about an author who dealt with her repression via writing: â€Å"Writing for H.D. takes on the magical and the therapeutic value of the talking cure for Freud.†. The psychiatrists are trying to find a successful way to extract Teddy’s trauma in order that he may face its reality and ultimately be relieved of his many psychological and physiological symptoms. Unfortunately, the trauma proves too severe and Teddy is ultimately unable to retrieve the repressed object from his unconscious and progress to a state of reality, and the reader is left with a case study that highlights the mystery and incompleteness in which we understand psychoanalysis and even psychology as a whole. Despite his constant living in delusion, it is said by Teddy’s psychiatrist that, â€Å"In his own peculiar way, he hated lies more than anyone I have ever known .† (Lehane 2). Works Cited Freedman, Ariela. Gifts, goods and Gods: H.D., Freud and trauma. English Studies in Canada, vol. 29, no. 3-4, 2003, p. 184+. Literature Resource Center,login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRCsw=wu=mcc_mesav=2.1id=GALE%7CA169457976it=rasid=3eddccf0edc325dbf9e136ca709dcba8. Accessed 3 Nov. 2016. Freud, Sigmund. Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1988. Print. Interlandi, Jeneen. How Do You Heal a Traumatized Mind? The New York Times Magazine, 25 May 2014, p. 42(L). Literature Resource Center, login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRCsw=wu=mcc_mesav=2.1id=GALE%7CA369148198it=rasid=06875ca262827670c7ce3c33bb58d0b7. Accessed 3 Nov. 2016. Kamuf, Peggy. The deconstitution of psychoanalysis. Mosaic: A journal for the interdisciplinary study of literature, vol. 42, no. 4, 2009, p. 35+. Literature Resource Center,login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRCsw=wu=mcc_mesav=2.1id=GALE%7CA214547706it=rasid=f2a5ceda50719ffb3e1d4dcbd69bf27f. Accessed 3 Nov. 2016. Lehane, Dennis. Shutter Island. New York, Harper, 2009. Sabouri, Hossein, and Majid M. Sadeghzadegan. Distress and psychological distortions in Dennis Lehanes Shutter Island. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2013, p. 376+. Literature Resource Center, login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRCsw=wu=mcc_mesav=2.1id=GALE%7CA351081922it=rasid=5a16e662f1dc9c3a121e56ba627a4243. Accessed 3 Nov. 2016. Wilson, John G. Repression: psychoanalytic and Sartrean phenomenological perspectives.Existential Analysis, vol. 21, no. 2, 2010, p. 271+. Literature Resource Center,login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRCsw=wu=mcc_mesav=2.1id=GALE%7CA288874200it=rasid=01fe1738437108731fd7a909b1f733f4. Accessed 3 Nov. 2016. [1] The reason being for my referring to Andrew Laeddis as Edward â€Å"Teddy† Daniels is because the narrative follows the latter name throughout the novel; In Teddy’s delusion, Andrew Laeddis is assigned the crime of having killed Teddy’s wife, as the thought of him killing his own wife was too much to mentally bear, and Andrew Laeddis (who, in reality, is the protagonist) instead becomes a completely separate entity from the fictitious identity of â€Å"Edward ‘Teddy’ Daniels†.

China Modernizes - Threat or Model Free Essay Example, 1750 words

Despite its interactions with other countries in the economy market, China s law infringes on the geopolitical stability; as the country has used its growing power to sell missiles and other weapons of massive destruction to rogue states. This view assumes that China s authoritarian regime is not just a threat to the economy of the western world but also a greater risk to world peace as well. These aspects are also based on the historical observation that with the rise of new power conflicts and geo-stability emerge too; making it futile for the underdeveloped Chinese legal system to sustain the growth. Accordingly, the US and other allies now prepare for the uncertain future as China continues to grow, with the hope that developed China would change and embrace the spirit of peaceful democracy. This view contrasts the critical view mentioned above as it perceives China as a paradigm for the states that are still developing. Supporters of this view link it to the 21st-century techno logy that is boosting the unprecedented growth across East Asia. This pillar has a six-pillar basis, but not all who support this view agree with all the six. We will write a custom essay sample on China Modernizes - Threat or Model or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page They have instead shied away from the liberal rule of democracy found in Euro-America to more cultural norms and institutional development strategies (Peerenboom, 2007).

Hanover College Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores, GPA

Hanover College is a private liberal arts college with an acceptance rate of 79%. Located in southeastern Indiana, Hanover is affiliated with the Presbyterian Church and is the oldest private college in Indiana. Hanover places emphasis on experiential learning including research, independent study, and project-based internships. Hanover has an impressive 13-to-1  student / faculty ratio  and students can choose from over 32 majors or design their own major. On the athletic front, the Hanover Panthers compete in the NCAA Division III Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference. Considering applying to Hanover College? Here are the admissions statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, Hanover College had an acceptance rate of 79%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 79 students were admitted, making Hanovers admissions process somewhat competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 3,229 Percent Admitted 79% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 14% SAT Scores and Requirements Hanover College has a test-optional standardized testing policy. Applicants to Hanover may submit SAT or ACT scores to the school, but they are not required.  During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 29% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 520 640 Math 520 620 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that of those students who submitted scores during the 2017-18 admissions cycle, most of  Hanover Colleges admitted students fall within the  top 35% nationally  on the SAT. For the evidence-based reading and writing section, 50% of students admitted to Hanover scored between 520 and 640, while 25% scored below 520 and 25% scored above 640. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 520 and 620, while 25% scored below 520 and 25% scored above 620. While the SAT is not required, this data tells us that a composite SAT score of 1260 or higher is competitive for Hanover. Requirements Hanover College does not require SAT scores for admission. For students who choose to submit scores, note that Hanover participates in the scorechoice program, meaning that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all SAT test dates. Hanover does not require the optional essay portion of the SAT. ACT Scores and Requirements Hanover College has a test-optional standardized testing policy. Applicants may submit SAT or ACT scores to the school, but they are not required. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 30% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 21 28 Math 20 27 Composite 22 27 This admissions data tells us that of those who submitted scores during the 2017-18 admissions cycle, most of Hanovers admitted students fall within the  top 36% nationally  on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Hanover received a composite ACT score between 22 and 27, while 25% scored above 27 and 25% scored below 22. Requirements Note that Hanover does not require ACT scores for admission. For students who choose to submit scores, Hanover College participates in the scorechoice program, meaning that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all ACT test dates. Hanover does not require the optional ACT writing section. GPA In 2019, the average high school GPA of Hanover Colleges incoming freshmen class was 3.73. This data suggests that most successful applicants to Hanover College have primarily A grades. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph Hanover College Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to Hanover College. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances Hanover College, which accepts just over three-quarters of applicants, has a somewhat competitive admissions pool with above average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs. However, Hanover also has a  holistic admissions  process and is test-optional, and admissions decisions are based on more than numbers. A strong  optional application essay  or writing sample and  glowing letters of recommendation  can strengthen your application, as can participation in meaningful  extracurricular activities  and a  rigorous course schedule. The college is looking for students who will contribute to the campus community in meaningful ways, not just students who show promise in the classroom. While not required, Hanover strongly recommends  interviews  for interested applicants. Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their grades and scores are outside of Hanover Colleges average range. In the graph above, the blue and green dots represent students accepted to Hanover College. Most had SAT scores (ERWM) of 1000 or higher, an ACT composite of 20 or higher, and a high school average of a B or better. Note that Hanover College is test-optional, so grades are more important than test scores in the admissions process. If You Like Hanover College, You May Also Like These Schools Butler UniversityBradley UniversityWesleyan UniversityOberlin CollegeHaverford CollegeAmherst Collegeï » ¿ All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and Hanover College Undergraduate Admissions Office.

Essay on Symbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck

Symbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck A symbol is an act, person, thing, or spectacle that stands for something else, by association a usually broader idea in addition to its own literal meaning (Cassill Bausch, 1728). John Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums may seem as a story describing a simple day with the Allen couple. It begins with Elisa Allen working in her garden and her husband, Henry Allen, negotiating with two suited business men that want to purchase steers. They seem to engage in conversations and go about their day as they normally would do. By the time the story ends, they are on their way to dinner and a movie. At first glance, this story may seem as nothing special, just a day in the life of fairly†¦show more content†¦This description of the Salina Valley is closely related to her character. Elisas isolation and constraint is represented by the description of the valley. Elisa feels cut off from the rest of the world; she has no independence, and lives in a male dominated society. The vall ey being described as a, closed pot can also be considered a metaphor for Elisas existence, she knows how the rest of her life is going to be, and she is not happy knowing that she is so limited in choices. Elisa lives in a masculine world with countless qualities hidden under her mans hat, clodhopper shoes, and a big corduroy apron she wears to garden. One of the reasons that Elisa may feel more restricted is because of the fact that she does not have any children to distract her, therefore spends the majority of the time contemplating about her life. This gives a slight indication that they might not be able to have children. During the period of time that this story was written, it was very unlikely for a married woman, especially at the age of thirty-five, not to have children. The fact that Elisa is childless makes it even more evident that she seems to need more fulfillments in her life. The importance of Elisas gardening abilities is that she wishes to take care of someone, and since she has no one other that Henry, which does not seem much of help for her, she transfers these maternal instincts onto her flowers. As one can see already, the Chrysanthemums that ElisaShow Mor eRelatedSymbolism in the Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck1758 Words   |  8 PagesJohn Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums is a story that is full of symbolism. After the first read, it might seem like an innocent tale about a woman and her garden. However, upon further examination, the reader learns it is actually a story about a womans desires and frustrations in her life. Steinbeck uses many examples, such as the flowers to symbolize the thoughts and ideas of the main character, Elisa, in this story. Elisa Allen is a lonesome woman who gets pleasure from growingRead MoreSymbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck Essay1547 Words   |  7 PagesSymbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck The Chrysanthemums, one of John Steinbecks masterpieces, describes a lonely farmers wife, Elisa Allen. Elisa Allens physical appearance is very mannish yet still allows a hint of a feminine side to peek through. John Steinbeck brings symbolism into play to represent Elisa Allens frustrations and hidden passions. Isolation is another representation through symbolism found in The Chrysanthemums. Elisas failing detached marriage is representedRead MoreEssay about Symbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck700 Words   |  3 PagesSymbolism in The Chrysanthemums by John Steinbeck At first glance John Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums seems to be a story of a woman whose niche is in the garden. Upon deeper inspection, the story reveals strong symbolisms of children, vulnerability, and connection--being the most important, of the main character. Elisa Allen is the main character who is at her strongest and most proud in the garden and weakened when she becomes vulnerable and loses her connection to the outer worldRead MoreComparing John Steinbeck s Mice And Men And The Grapes Of Wrath1126 Words   |  5 PagesComparing and Contrasting Steinbeck John Steinbeck is a famous author known for many of his short stories, as well as the books Of Mice and Men and The Grapes of Wrath. His works have been studied and analyzed often because of his unique ability to create symbolism from small amounts of text. â€Å"The Chrysanthemums† is a short story written by John Steinbeck, and was first published in 1939. It tells the story of a woman who feels she is capable of completing any task a man can, but is set back byRead More The Chrysanthemums Essay1649 Words   |  7 PagesJohn Steinbeck’s, The Chrysanthemums, was published in 1938 in a book of short stories, entitled The Long Valley. The Chrysanthemums has been a rather powerful draw for scholars because of its wide gap for interpretations and analysis of its main protagonist character, Elisa Allen and also the unique descriptions used to portray the deeper meaning behind the setting of the story. Themes of sexuality, oppression of women, as well as other numerous typ es of conflict portrayed in this rather somberRead MoreThe Chrysanthemums By John Steinbeck982 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The Chrysanthemums† is a short story written by John Steinbeck. The story was originally published in 1937 before later being released as a part of his The Long Valley collection. This is an important story as it expresses women in a way that is more realistic, showing their true boredom, ambition, and capabilities. Some scholars interpreted this story differently, but C. Kenneth Pellow interprets it as â€Å"radically feministic.† The Great Depression was finally ending and women’s rights were risingRead MoreThe Chrysanthemums973 Words   |  4 Pages Prompt: How do the chrysanthemums as well as other symbols throughout the short story show women’s role in society? A Potential for Equality   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Humans, just as flowers, cannot fully live without sunlight. They cannot develop without nourishment, and most of all they cannot flourish if not carefully tended to. Just as the Chrysanthemums fight to stay strong and meaningful in the short story, â€Å"The Chrysanthemums† by John Steinbeck, the main character, Emily, tries to do the same. BothRead MoreAlice Munros Boys and Girls and John Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums1455 Words   |  6 Pagesand taking care of the children. While this stereotype does not exist as much in the 21st century, it was very prevalent in the 1900s. By using many different literary tools such as character development, symbolism, and setting, Alice Munro’s Boys and Girls and John Steinbeck’s The Chrysanthemums challenge this controversial topic of the treatment of women versus men in the 1900s. Munro uses a fox farm for the setting of Boys and Girls to bring out many of the social issues between genders. WhileRead MoreThe Chrysanthemums Symbolism Analysis1040 Words   |  5 PagesMale Dominance Revealed Through Symbolism in The Chrysanthemums In Steinbeck’s â€Å"The Chrysanthemum† a story is told of a woman who loves to garden and tend to her beautiful chrysanthemums, a husband who tends to the matters of business on the ranch, and the strange encounter with a tinkerer. Each of these aspects create the story, but there is more depth than what meets the eye. Through Steinbeck’s short story one can recognize many symbols that represent the different gender roles of men andRead MoreLiterary Analysis the Chrysanthemums1128 Words   |  5 PagesProfessor Course Date: Chrysanthemums: Literary Criticism At the turn of the 20th century, women were considered inferior to men: they were only required to stay at home, take care of households and children. â€Å"The Chrysanthemums†, as told by John Steinbeck, is a story of a woman during that period who tries to change the course of her destiny. In this story, the two-fold issues of femininity and symbolism play a critical part in explaining this helplessness. Steinbeck uses the narrative to signify